DocuBase  

 

TITLE: SEASONAL REASSEMBLY OF A RIVER FOOD WEB: FLOODS, DROUGHTS, AND IMPACTS OF FISH
AUTHOR: MARY E. POWER,1,4 MICHAEL S. PARKER,2 AND WILLIAM E. DIETRICH 3
KEYWORDS: algal blooms; Cladophora glomerata; context dependency; effect sizes; flood scour; food chain length; interaction strength; Lavinia (Hesperoleucas) symmetricus; long-term studies; Mediterranean hydrologic regimes; Oncorhynchus mykiss; predator impacts.
NOTES: 1Department of Integrative Biology, University of California–Berkeley, Berkeley, California 94707-3140 USA 2Department of Biology, 1250 Siskiyou Boulevard, Southern Oregon University, Ashland, Oregon 97520 USA 3Department of Earth and Planetary Science,
ABSTRACT: Eighteen years of field observations and five summer field experiments in a coastal California river suggest that hydrologic regimes influence algal blooms and the impacts of fish on algae, cyanobacteria, invertebrates, and small vertebrates. In this Mediterranean climate, rainy winters precede the biologically active summer low-flow season. Cladophora glomerata, the filamentous green alga that dominates primary producer biomass during summer, reaches peak biomass during late spring or early summer. Cladophora blooms are larger if floods during the preceding winter attained or exceeded ‘‘bankfull discharge’’ (sufficient to mobilize much of the river bed, estimated at 120 m3/s). In 9 out of 12 summers preceded by large bed-scouring floods, the average peak height of attached Cladophora turfs equaled or exceeded 50 cm. In five out of six years when flows remained below bankfull, Cladophora biomass peaked at lower levels. Flood effects on algae were partially mediated through impacts on consumers in food webs. In three experiments that followed scouring winter floods, juvenile steelhead (Oncorhynchus mykiss) and roach (Lavinia (Hesperoleucas) symmetricus) suppressed certain insects and young-of-the-year fish fry, affecting persistence or accrual of algae positively or negatively, depending on the predator-specific vulnerabilities of primary consumers capable of suppressing algae during a given year. During two post-flood years, these grazers were more vulnerable to small predators (odonates and fish fry, which stocked steelhead always suppressed) than to experimentally manipulated, larger fish, which had adverse effects on algae in those years. During one post-flood year, all enclosed grazers capable of suppressing algae were consumed by steelhead, which therefore had positive effects on algae. During drought years, when no bed-scouring winter flows occurred, large armored caddisflies (Dicosmoecus gilvipes) were more abundant during the subsequent summer. In drought-year experiments, stocked fish had little or no influence on algal standing crops, which increased only when Dicosmoecus were removed from enclosures. Flood scour, by suppressing invulnerable grazers, set the stage for fish mediated effects on algae in this river food web. Whether these effects were positive or negative depended on the predator-specific vulnerabilities of primary consumers that dominated during a given summer.
COLLECTION: Dietrich
ID: 202

YOU CAN VIEW THIS DOCUMENT IN THE FOLLOWING WAYS:

  • PDF (from the DocuBase repository)



    Search DocuBase

    Edit this document

  • Back to DocuBase

    BNHM      University of California, Berkeley